Labour Unions React to FG’s N5bn Fuel Subsidy Removal Palliative to States

The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) have expressed their dissatisfaction with the Federal Government’s decision to give N5 billion to each state and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) as a palliative for the removal of fuel subsidy.

The labour unions accused the government of subverting the social dialogue process and doubted the transparency and accountability of the state governors in disbursing the funds.

The Federal Government had announced that it approved N5 billion for each state and the FCT to enable them to procure food items for distribution to the poor in their respective states. Governor Babagana Zulum of Borno State disclosed this at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, shortly after the National Economic Council (NEC) meeting. He also said that the Federal Government released five trucks of rice each to the 36 state governors.

However, the Labour Unions have rejected the move, saying that it was not in line with the agreement they reached with the government on the modalities for cushioning the impact of fuel subsidy removal on Nigerians. They also expressed their distrust of the state governors, alleging that they would divert the funds and food items to their political cronies and not the poor masses.

The NLC President, Joe Ajaero, said that the Federal Government was about sharing N2,000 and a cup of rice to poor people across the country. He said that this was not a palliative but an insult to Nigerians who are suffering from high inflation, unemployment, insecurity, and poverty. He also said that most of the governors were not paying minimum wage and could not be trusted with public funds.

Ajaero said, “N5bn multiplied by 36 states is going to give you N180bn. So if you divide that with the official figures from the National Bureau of Statistics, which says that 133 million Nigerians are multi-dimensionally poor, and calculate it, you will get about N2,000 each for those who are poor.

“That is the official statistics of the government, but you and I know that the actual figure is more than that.

“So is that what to celebrate? And then, five trucks or there about, of rice to a state. The poor people of these states cannot get one cup of rice. It will not go round.

“Even if you pick them from the poverty bracket, it will be difficult for them to get one cup of rice. Is that the best we can do? Is that the best approach to governance? So do we look at our people as people we should give one cup of rice and N2,000? Is that palliative? Who are governors you are giving it to? Is it the governors who have not paid minimum wage? Is there any committee to ensure the effective disbursement of that which is very insufficient?”

The Assistant National Secretary-General of the NLC, Mr Chris Onyeka, wondered why the federal government released the palliative to state governors when most of them have refused to pay minimum wage to workers.

Onyeka said that the NLC would stick to the milestones that they agreed with the government on how to mitigate the effects of fuel subsidy removal. He said that giving money to governors was a subversion of social dialogue, peace, and democracy.

Onyeka said, “The money will not get to the people; let them share the money as they want, but what the NLC agreed with them were certain milestones.

“The NLC will close its eyes to what the Federal Government is trying to give to the governors.

“To us, as far as we are concerned, NLC will still stick to the milestones that we have agreed on; we will insist that those things are discussed and implemented to the letter. When the Federal Government wants to subvert the instrument of dialogue, it intentionally creates problems.

“The Federal Government had already started engaging using this instrument when they engaged the NLC; for them now to go and sit down at the level of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum and to go and pretend to give them money is a subversion of social dialogue, subversion of peace, and a subversion of democracy because it is not democratic.”

Similarly, the TUC Deputy National President, Tommy Etim, submitted that “It is one thing to make pronouncements. Implementation is another thing. I am sure you remember what happened to the COVID-19 palliatives in 2020 when foodstuffs were stored in warehouses and kept from hungry citizens.

“Same thing with the issue of the Paris Club relief fund that some governors went to hide in the bank so that they could get some from it while citizens were starving.

 “We need a body that will follow up on the implementation because left to the state governors; the palliatives may not get to places where it should get. We need a body that will make them accountable. We need the citizens to be aware. The body should let everyone know when each state gets its own relief (package). Everyone should know the details that are received by each state, how the packages were distribute.’’

Newsflash Nigeria is an online newspaper that is developed and written exclusively for Nigerians. It’s packed with up-to-the-minute Local and National Economy News, Share & Capital Market, Health, Sports, Education, Technology, Business and Opinions.

To make further advert enquiries or place an order, please contact us at [email protected] and +2348053316946 and WhatsApp number 08033546732

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE

Patrick Odey

Patrick Odey, a native of Benin, Edo State. He studied the English Language at the University of Benin, Edo State. He is a Blogger Contact: [email protected]

Related Articles

Back to top button